Friday, May 14, 2010

Is a Monarchy More or Less Effective Than a Democracy?

Is monarchy more or less effective than democracy?

Who wants to have rights taken away, not have a say in what goes on where they live, or constantly be told what to do? Being treated fairly and having certain rights are things that many people desire and want. A monarchy is “is a form of government in which all political power is absolutely or nominally lodged with an individual.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy) Monarchies rule and have ruled various places in the world. A democracy is the opposite of a monarchy, it being “a political government carried out either directly by the people (direct democracy) or by means of elected representatives of the people, as if the people and the elected person were one, linear line of decisions.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy) A monarchy is less effective for the people, and a democracy is more effective for the people.

In a monarchy, the person in charge has all of the power. Power can corrupt; therefore, the amount of power that this person obtains could be a negative thing. The Treasons Act was written in 1571 protecting Queen Elizabeth I from criticism, which does not allow people to speak freely about how they feel. This act states, “An act whereby certaine offences be made treason....Be it enacted, declared, and established...that, if any person or persons whatsoever, at any time after the last day of June next coming during the natural life of our most gracious sovereign lady, Queen Elizabeth..., shall, within the realm or without, compass, imagine, invent, devise, or intend the death or destruction, or any bodily harm tending to death, destruction, maim, or wounding of the royal person of the same our sovereign lady, Queen Elizabeth..” (http://www.gunpowder-plot.org/archives/eliz2.htm) In Europe, the government has always been a monarchy, and the people have gone through many hardships such as being slaves who were treated unfairly. This act is meant to protect the one in charge, in this case, the Queen. It is unfair to have one single person make rules for everyone else to follow. A monarchy is not effective for the people because they are the ones living under the rules of one person with no say in what goes on.

The ones living in the land should be the people who decide how they live. This is the case in the United States of America. The US is a democracy, and has the motto E Pluribus Unum, which means “out of many, one.” The citizens of the United States’ ability to control the way they live is made evident in the beginning of the Declaration of Independence. It states, “That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.” (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/declare.asp) In the United States, barriers between races and social classes have been broken because of the rule of the people. The government is composed of a system of checks and balances in order to prevent one branch from having too much power. People live happily and freely in the United States, and are able to express themselves freely, made clear in the First Amendment of the Constitution: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/rights1.asp) In a democracy, power is equal, which leads to people being treaty fairly and being happy so they can lead a successful and effective life.

A monarchy is one way to rule, but a democracy is the more effective way for the people. Democracies have proven to be successful and cause great improvements, happiness, and justice.


Works Cited


"Constitution of the United States : Bill of Rights." Web. 14 May 2010. <http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/rights1.asp>.


"Democracy." Wikipedia. Web. 14 May 2010. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy>.


"Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776." Web. 14 May 2010.

<http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/declare.asp>.


"Monarchy." Wikipedia. Web. 14 May 2010. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy>.


"Treasons Act, 1571." Web. 14 May 2010. <http://www.gunpowder-plot.org/archives/eliz2.htm>.


Picture Source:

"E Pluribus Unum." Flickr. Web. 14 May 2010. <http://www.flickr.com/photos/wmliu/82303788/>.

1 comment:

  1. While it's great that you've found primary sources, the source from the Gunpowder Plot Archives doesn't really relate to your thesis; that was a law that related directly to a plot against the Tudors in different context.

    And a question: if democracy is "more effective", then why did the Athenian democracy fail so relatively quickly?

    ReplyDelete